Deprivation Statistics Comparison for Bushbury North, Wolverhampton

English Indices of Deprivation statistical comparisons for Lower-Super Output Areas in Bushbury North, Wolverhampton, West Midlands

We have used the 10 English index of deprivation statistics Lower-Super Output Areas (LSOAs) in Bushbury North, to provide you with an at-a-glace overview of deprivation in this area of Wolverhampton. We have combined these statitics into an English ward level, as most people are familiar with this geospacial area in their town or city. Here are those 10 marked on a map:

Each area has its own decile score. This is where each LSOA in England is ranked according to the level of deprivation and split into 10 equal groups. A decile score of 1 means the area is in the top 10% of deprived areas, 2 is equal to the top 20% and so forth. To simply these scores and apply them to a ward, we have created the iLiveHere rating. This takes the average decile score of all the LSOAs in a ward and converts that into a rating out of 10, where 1 is the best and 10 is the worst. We have then used to traffic light colour system as an at-a-glance reference. As you scroll down this page, the more red ratings you see, the more deprived Bushbury North is.Indices of Deprivation statistics and are broken down into domains of deprivation or more simply, categories. These category scores are combined using a percentage weighting to give a an LSOA its final indices of deprivation score, decile and rank:

  • Income Deprivation (22.5%)
  • Employment Deprivation (22.5%)
  • Education, Skills and Training Deprivation (13.5%)
  • Health Deprivation and Disability (13.5%)
  • Crime (9.3%)
  • Barriers to Housing and Services (9.3%)
  • Living Environment Deprivation (9.3%)
Below we have split the Living Environment Deprivation category into its sub-categories. We think having individual iLiveHere ratings for Inside Environment and Outside Environment provides a better insight to the housing quality and outside space in Bushbury North. However, the Living Environment Deprivation decile is used for the overall ward iLiveHere rating.

Overall Deprivation in Bushbury North

7
Below Average
iLivehere Rating 7/10
Taking into consideration all the English Indices of Deprivation (2019) domains, this is our overall iLiveHere rating for Bushbury North. It is certainly something you should take into account if you are thinking of moving to this area of Wolverhampton.
LSOA NameIMD ScoreIMD Rank (England)IMD Decile
Wolverhampton 006A51.1542007/32,8441
Wolverhampton 001F45.6872910/32,8441
Wolverhampton 001G41.8223775/32,8442
Wolverhampton 001E38.2644801/32,8442
Wolverhampton 002A29.8688084/32,8443
Wolverhampton 001A27.2429441/32,8443
Wolverhampton 002C20.9513587/32,8445
Wolverhampton 001D15.83718096/32,8446
Wolverhampton 001B13.03821011/32,8447
Wolverhampton 001C8.74126125/32,8448

Income Deprivation in Bushbury North

7
Below Average
iLivehere Rating 7/10
This iLiveHere rating is an indicator of what proportion of the population are experiencing deprivation relating to low income in Bushbury North. The definition of low income the government uses to compile these statistics includes those who are out-of-work (for any reason, not just unemployment) and those that are in work but satisfy the IMD means tests. In the real world, this means they may qualify for means tested benefits such as Universal Credit or legacy benefits such as Working Tax Credits. You should not to assume that this rating is an indicator of overall poverty in this ward.
LSOA NameIncome ScoreIncome Rank (England)Income Decile
Wolverhampton 006A0.352994/32,8441
Wolverhampton 001F0.2842744/32,8441
Wolverhampton 001G0.2673341/32,8442
Wolverhampton 001E0.2494052/32,8442
Wolverhampton 002A0.2175701/32,8442
Wolverhampton 001A0.1887452/32,8443
Wolverhampton 002C0.12313391/32,8445
Wolverhampton 001D0.08718315/32,8446
Wolverhampton 001B0.07221049/32,8447
Wolverhampton 001C0.05325387/32,8448

Employment Deprivation in Bushbury North

7
Below Average
iLivehere Rating 7/10
This iLiveHere rating is an iundicator of the proportion of working-age residents in Bushbury North who are excluded from the jobs market. These are people who are involuntarily deprived of work. The IMD domains include people who are unemployment, those who are sick or disabled, and carers. Since the government no longer publishes percentage figures for unemployment after the introduction of Universal Credit, his is now the only reliable indictor of joblessness in this ward. The higher the iLiveHere rating, the harder it could be to get work.
LSOA NameEmployment ScoreEmployment Rank (England)Employment Decile
Wolverhampton 001F0.241607/32,8441
Wolverhampton 006A0.222260/32,8441
Wolverhampton 001G0.212691/32,8441
Wolverhampton 001E0.1734752/32,8442
Wolverhampton 002A0.1566006/32,8442
Wolverhampton 001A0.138556/32,8443
Wolverhampton 002C0.0914376/32,8445
Wolverhampton 001D0.08814637/32,8445
Wolverhampton 001B0.07417832/32,8446
Wolverhampton 001C0.04825296/32,8448

Education, Skills and Training Deprivation in Bushbury North

7
Below Average
iLivehere Rating 7/10
This iLiveHere rating ia an indicator of the lack of formal qualification and job-based skills in the Bushbury North population. The average Education, Skill and Training rank for children (15701/32,844) in Bushbury North is more than the adult average rank (7430/32,844). It could be argued that the more educated children leave the area.
LSOA NameEducation ScoreEducation Rank (England)Education Decile
Wolverhampton 001G47.633641/32,8442
Wolverhampton 006A47.3043704/32,8442
Wolverhampton 001F45.2034122/32,8442
Wolverhampton 001E44.8444199/32,8442
Wolverhampton 002A23.39811677/32,8444
Wolverhampton 001A23.37311693/32,8444
Wolverhampton 002C19.66713972/32,8445
Wolverhampton 001D19.21714248/32,8445
Wolverhampton 001B14.56917703/32,8446
Wolverhampton 001C8.51323395/32,8448

Health Deprivation and Disability in Bushbury North

8
Bad
iLivehere Rating 8/10
This iLiveHere rating is indictor of the risk of dying prematurely or having your quality of life impaired through poor physical or mental health in Bushbury North. The IMD domain measures morbidity, disability and premature mortality. However, it does not take into consideration but personal behaviour or environmental factors that may be predictive of future health problems. See Outdoor Deprivation for depivation that includes environmental factors such as local pullution levels.
LSOA NameHealth ScoreHealth Rank (England)Health Decile
Wolverhampton 001F1.4491662/32,8441
Wolverhampton 006A1.1443206/32,8441
Wolverhampton 001E1.0074174/32,8442
Wolverhampton 001G0.9754412/32,8442
Wolverhampton 002A0.7386493/32,8442
Wolverhampton 001A0.5798176/32,8443
Wolverhampton 002C0.4689487/32,8443
Wolverhampton 001D0.21112912/32,8444
Wolverhampton 001B0.00315962/32,8445
Wolverhampton 001C-0.24819844/32,8447

Crime Deprivation in Bushbury North

4
Above Average
iLivehere Rating 4/10
This iLiveHere rating is an indictor of how likely you are to be a victim of personal and material crime in Bushbury North. In policing statistics, this is known as 'street level crime' and includes offences such as robbery, burglary and other personal violent crime.
LSOA NameCrime ScoreCrime Rank (England)Crime Decile
Wolverhampton 006A0.5328651/32,8443
Wolverhampton 001E0.34111303/32,8444
Wolverhampton 001G0.26812423/32,8444
Wolverhampton 001F0.03116205/32,8445
Wolverhampton 001A-0.22920028/32,8447
Wolverhampton 002C-0.34721697/32,8447
Wolverhampton 001D-0.69126133/32,8448
Wolverhampton 001C-1.07829669/32,84410
Wolverhampton 001B-1.21530557/32,84410
Wolverhampton 002A-1.24530714/32,84410

There were 202 street level crime incidents in the Policing neighbourhood that covers Bushbury North in September 2024

Barriers to Housing and Services in Bushbury North

5
Average
iLivehere Rating 5/10
This iLiveHere rating measures the financial accessibility and physical accessibility to housing and local services in Bushbury North. I bad rating in an urban area indicates how unaffordable the housing could be. A bad rating in a rural area is an indicator of the absense of local services.
LSOA NameBarriers ScoreBarriers Rank (England)Barriers Decile
Wolverhampton 006A29.557274/32,8443
Wolverhampton 001C27.6178745/32,8443
Wolverhampton 001B27.0569213/32,8443
Wolverhampton 001E22.03814282/32,8445
Wolverhampton 001F20.4916081/32,8445
Wolverhampton 002C19.36417435/32,8446
Wolverhampton 001G18.81218104/32,8446
Wolverhampton 001A16.49521046/32,8447
Wolverhampton 002A14.87623200/32,8448
Wolverhampton 001D10.75727890/32,8449

Inside Environment Deprivation in Bushbury North

7
Below Average
iLivehere Rating 7/10
This iLivehHere rating is an indicator of the quality of housing in Bushbury North. A bad rating in an equally income deprived ward, could be because of poorly maintained rented accomodation. A bad rating in a non income deprived area, could be because the small size of housing in relation to costs.
LSOA NameInside ScoreInside Rank (England)Inside Decile
Wolverhampton 002A0.984014/32,8442
Wolverhampton 001A0.924500/32,8442
Wolverhampton 002C0.9014697/32,8442
Wolverhampton 001G0.6297598/32,8443
Wolverhampton 006A0.5558479/32,8443
Wolverhampton 001E0.5079098/32,8443
Wolverhampton 001D0.4419982/32,8444
Wolverhampton 001F0.15714038/32,8445
Wolverhampton 001B-0.32921575/32,8447
Wolverhampton 001C-0.65225791/32,8448

Outside Environment Deprivation in Bushbury North

6
Average
iLivehere Rating 6/10
This iLiveHere rating is an indicator of what the outdoors environment is like in Bushbury North. The IMD domains measure the air quality and the rate of road traffic accidents in each LSOA.
LSOA NameOutside ScoreOutside (England)Outside Decile
Wolverhampton 001D0.5647741/32,8443
Wolverhampton 006A0.30810630/32,8444
Wolverhampton 002C0.23211676/32,8444
Wolverhampton 001A0.20512068/32,8444
Wolverhampton 001G0.07314118/32,8445
Wolverhampton 002A0.04414584/32,8445
Wolverhampton 001C-0.07516550/32,8446
Wolverhampton 001B-0.09916949/32,8446
Wolverhampton 001E-0.13317558/32,8446
Wolverhampton 001F-0.19618580/32,8446

Disclaimer: Although every care has been taken to make sure there are no mistakes in the data presented on this page, you should verify these figures with the official data source.