Deprivation Statistics Comparison for Bridge, Ipswich

English Indices of Deprivation statistical comparisons for Lower-Super Output Areas in Bridge, Ipswich, Suffolk

We have used the 6 English index of deprivation statistics Lower-Super Output Areas (LSOAs) in Bridge, to provide you with an at-a-glace overview of deprivation in this area of Ipswich. We have combined these statitics into an English ward level, as most people are familiar with this geospacial area in their town or city. Here are those 6 marked on a map:

Each area has its own decile score. This is where each LSOA in England is ranked according to the level of deprivation and split into 10 equal groups. A decile score of 1 means the area is in the top 10% of deprived areas, 2 is equal to the top 20% and so forth. To simply these scores and apply them to a ward, we have created the iLiveHere rating. This takes the average decile score of all the LSOAs in a ward and converts that into a rating out of 10, where 1 is the best and 10 is the worst. We have then used to traffic light colour system as an at-a-glance reference. As you scroll down this page, the more red ratings you see, the more deprived Bridge is.Indices of Deprivation statistics and are broken down into domains of deprivation or more simply, categories. These category scores are combined using a percentage weighting to give a an LSOA its final indices of deprivation score, decile and rank:

  • Income Deprivation (22.5%)
  • Employment Deprivation (22.5%)
  • Education, Skills and Training Deprivation (13.5%)
  • Health Deprivation and Disability (13.5%)
  • Crime (9.3%)
  • Barriers to Housing and Services (9.3%)
  • Living Environment Deprivation (9.3%)
Below we have split the Living Environment Deprivation category into its sub-categories. We think having individual iLiveHere ratings for Inside Environment and Outside Environment provides a better insight to the housing quality and outside space in Bridge. However, the Living Environment Deprivation decile is used for the overall ward iLiveHere rating.

Overall Deprivation in Bridge

8
Bad
iLivehere Rating 8/10
Taking into consideration all the English Indices of Deprivation (2019) domains, this is our overall iLiveHere rating for Bridge. It is certainly something you should take into account if you are thinking of moving to this area of Ipswich.
LSOA NameIMD ScoreIMD Rank (England)IMD Decile
Ipswich 012G51.3581978/32,8441
Ipswich 012F36.8395253/32,8442
Ipswich 012D35.6095674/32,8442
Ipswich 012B33.6896378/32,8442
Ipswich 012A29.3758312/32,8443
Ipswich 012C19.35514954/32,8445

Income Deprivation in Bridge

8
Bad
iLivehere Rating 8/10
This iLiveHere rating is an indicator of what proportion of the population are experiencing deprivation relating to low income in Bridge. The definition of low income the government uses to compile these statistics includes those who are out-of-work (for any reason, not just unemployment) and those that are in work but satisfy the IMD means tests. In the real world, this means they may qualify for means tested benefits such as Universal Credit or legacy benefits such as Working Tax Credits. You should not to assume that this rating is an indicator of overall poverty in this ward.
LSOA NameIncome ScoreIncome Rank (England)Income Decile
Ipswich 012G0.2494083/32,8442
Ipswich 012D0.2424402/32,8442
Ipswich 012F0.216081/32,8442
Ipswich 012A0.1718710/32,8443
Ipswich 012B0.1569937/32,8444
Ipswich 012C0.11514271/32,8445

Employment Deprivation in Bridge

7
Below Average
iLivehere Rating 7/10
This iLiveHere rating is an iundicator of the proportion of working-age residents in Bridge who are excluded from the jobs market. These are people who are involuntarily deprived of work. The IMD domains include people who are unemployment, those who are sick or disabled, and carers. Since the government no longer publishes percentage figures for unemployment after the introduction of Universal Credit, his is now the only reliable indictor of joblessness in this ward. The higher the iLiveHere rating, the harder it could be to get work.
LSOA NameEmployment ScoreEmployment Rank (England)Employment Decile
Ipswich 012G0.2152476/32,8441
Ipswich 012D0.1655315/32,8442
Ipswich 012B0.1338162/32,8443
Ipswich 012F0.11410465/32,8444
Ipswich 012A0.11410469/32,8444
Ipswich 012C0.08714827/32,8445

Education, Skills and Training Deprivation in Bridge

8
Bad
iLivehere Rating 8/10
This iLiveHere rating ia an indicator of the lack of formal qualification and job-based skills in the Bridge population. The average Education, Skill and Training rank for children (5306/32,844) in Bridge is less than the adult average rank (7336/32,844). It could be argued that the more educated adults move into the area.
LSOA NameEducation ScoreEducation Rank (England)Education Decile
Ipswich 012F58.2611940/32,8441
Ipswich 012D45.933968/32,8442
Ipswich 012B41.4944998/32,8442
Ipswich 012G40.9825127/32,8442
Ipswich 012A36.7516252/32,8442
Ipswich 012C23.43311656/32,8444

Health Deprivation and Disability in Bridge

8
Bad
iLivehere Rating 8/10
This iLiveHere rating is indictor of the risk of dying prematurely or having your quality of life impaired through poor physical or mental health in Bridge. The IMD domain measures morbidity, disability and premature mortality. However, it does not take into consideration but personal behaviour or environmental factors that may be predictive of future health problems. See Outdoor Deprivation for depivation that includes environmental factors such as local pullution levels.
LSOA NameHealth ScoreHealth Rank (England)Health Decile
Ipswich 012B1.2482607/32,8441
Ipswich 012G1.2112799/32,8441
Ipswich 012D1.0953561/32,8442
Ipswich 012F0.8265670/32,8442
Ipswich 012C0.17313425/32,8445
Ipswich 012A0.13214007/32,8445

Crime Deprivation in Bridge

8
Bad
iLivehere Rating 8/10
This iLiveHere rating is an indictor of how likely you are to be a victim of personal and material crime in Bridge. In policing statistics, this is known as 'street level crime' and includes offences such as robbery, burglary and other personal violent crime.
LSOA NameCrime ScoreCrime Rank (England)Crime Decile
Ipswich 012G1.618748/32,8441
Ipswich 012A0.8834551/32,8442
Ipswich 012C0.7166326/32,8442
Ipswich 012B0.6836689/32,8443
Ipswich 012F0.4629596/32,8443
Ipswich 012D-0.00816814/32,8446

There were 591 street level crime incidents in the Policing neighbourhood that covers Bridge in August 2024

Barriers to Housing and Services in Bridge

6
Average
iLivehere Rating 6/10
This iLiveHere rating measures the financial accessibility and physical accessibility to housing and local services in Bridge. I bad rating in an urban area indicates how unaffordable the housing could be. A bad rating in a rural area is an indicator of the absense of local services.
LSOA NameBarriers ScoreBarriers Rank (England)Barriers Decile
Ipswich 012G35.6053803/32,8442
Ipswich 012F34.1994478/32,8442
Ipswich 012B23.10513092/32,8444
Ipswich 012A19.89616776/32,8446
Ipswich 012C18.37518645/32,8446
Ipswich 012D16.69520816/32,8447

Inside Environment Deprivation in Bridge

7
Below Average
iLivehere Rating 7/10
This iLivehHere rating is an indicator of the quality of housing in Bridge. A bad rating in an equally income deprived ward, could be because of poorly maintained rented accomodation. A bad rating in a non income deprived area, could be because the small size of housing in relation to costs.
LSOA NameInside ScoreInside Rank (England)Inside Decile
Ipswich 012A1.0853218/32,8441
Ipswich 012G1.0653370/32,8442
Ipswich 012F0.7586137/32,8442
Ipswich 012B0.716685/32,8443
Ipswich 012D0.28712044/32,8444
Ipswich 012C-0.30121167/32,8447

Outside Environment Deprivation in Bridge

4
Above Average
iLivehere Rating 4/10
This iLiveHere rating is an indicator of what the outdoors environment is like in Bridge. The IMD domains measure the air quality and the rate of road traffic accidents in each LSOA.
LSOA NameOutside ScoreOutside (England)Outside Decile
Ipswich 012G0.00715195/32,8445
Ipswich 012A-0.24619409/32,8446
Ipswich 012B-0.36121366/32,8447
Ipswich 012F-0.38721827/32,8447
Ipswich 012C-0.39721974/32,8447
Ipswich 012D-0.67625862/32,8448

Disclaimer: Although every care has been taken to make sure there are no mistakes in the data presented on this page, you should verify these figures with the official data source.